Linguistic pragmatism and codicalism

In Experiencing Language: What’s Missing in Linguistic Pragmatism?, Mark Johnson makes the case that experience has been incorrectly swept aside by the broom of language by pragmatic philosophers. I think codicalism’s yang⇄yin conception of languages⇄substrate is in accord with Johnson’s thesis.

While substrate cannot be discussed without languages, languages cannot be experienced without substrate. The horse (of matter and energy) is properly before the cart (of languages, computing, and mathematics). A linguistic object (“program”) can be compiled (“embodied”) into either a simulation (via a conventional compiler) or an assembly (via a matter compiler). And so forth.

 

Another formulation (October 9, 2015):

Codicalism =

       Rortian (linguistic) pragmatism
                        +
       Kantian (substrative) transcendentalism

 
 

Philip Thrift

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s